The Nevada Supreme Court stopped a challenge to a state amendment that would allow abortions up to birth in the Western state. As a result of the ruling, Nevada voters will vote this November on the radical amendment.
The Nevada Supreme Court unanimously approved the pro-abortion language after a district court judge has blocked it from moving forward — finding that it contained multiple subjects and was misleading.
The supreme court reversed, claiming that the amendment only addressed “reproductive freedom.”
LifeNews is on GETTR. Please follow us for the latest pro-life news
The campaign must submit at least 102,362 signatures for it to appear on the ballot. If it passes, voters will have to approve it again in 2026 for it to appear in the state constitution.
In a decision handed down November 21, Judge James T. Russell concluded that a proposed ballot initiative that would have embedded abortion in the Nevada constitution is too broad, contains a “misleading description of effect” and has an unfunded mandate.
“This is probably the clearest case I have seen that I think there is a violation of the single-subject rule,” Russell said, according to KOLO-TV Reno. “I’ve seen a lot of them over the years and in respect to this particular matter, there are too many subjects. Not all of which are functionally related to each other.”
The post Nevada Supreme Court Approves Ballot Amendment for Abortions Up to Birth appeared first on LifeNews.com.
The Nevada Supreme Court stopped a challenge to a state amendment that would allow abortions up to birth in the Western state. As a result of the ruling, Nevada voters will vote this November on the radical amendment. The Nevada Supreme Court unanimously approved the pro-abortion language after a district court judge has blocked it from […]
The post Nevada Supreme Court Approves Ballot Amendment for Abortions Up to Birth appeared first on LifeNews.com.