Missouri AG Andrew Bailey Sues New York Over Alleged Election Interference

Introduction

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey has filed a lawsuit against New York, alleging that actions taken by New York officials have interfered with the 2024 presidential election. Bailey asserts that New York's prosecution and gag order against President Trump hinder his ability to campaign, thus infringing on Missourians' First Amendment rights.

Legal Basis

Bailey is calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to use its original jurisdiction to resolve this interstate conflict. The lawsuit claims that New York's actions unlawfully restrict Trump's campaigning efforts and requests the removal of any gag orders and a delay in sentencing until after the election. This approach is based on the constitutional provision that allows the Supreme Court to handle disputes between states. The legal argument emphasizes that the actions of New York's judiciary are not just local matters but have national repercussions that affect the electoral rights of citizens in other states.

AG Bailey's Statement

AG Bailey expressed that New York's actions, driven by "radical progressives," aim to rig the election against Trump, thereby undermining democratic processes. He emphasizes the need to protect Missourians' right to an informed vote.

Specific Allegations

The lawsuit outlines three violations: interference with the election in other states, violation of the Purcell principle (which prevents changing election rules close to an election), and infringement on First Amendment rights of voters.

Background on New York's Actions

The suit details how Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's charges against Trump are politically motivated to benefit Joe Biden. Bragg's involvement, his campaign promises, and his hiring of Matthew Colangelo from Biden's DOJ are highlighted as evidence of bias.

Judicial Ethics Concerns

Judge Merchan's ethics are questioned, citing his donations to Biden’s campaign and his refusal to recuse himself from Trump’s case. The gag order imposed on Trump for publicly addressing these concerns is also contested.

Immediate Legal Actions

Bailey has filed for a preliminary injunction to halt New York's proceedings against Trump until after the election, arguing that the current legal constraints would already have affected the electoral process.

For more details, you can read the full article here.