Lara Logan, an investigative journalist, warns of China’s increasing threat to U.S. national security, particularly through the acquisition of farmland near military bases. She suggests that China may be preparing for unconventional warfare against the U.S. by positioning itself strategically on U.S. soil. Logan criticizes the Biden administration for failing to address these risks. This concern is reinforced by a report claiming Donald Trump's plane was targeted for assassination, highlighting growing domestic and foreign threats. Security experts are urging the U.S. government to take more aggressive action in countering China’s influence, with the ownership of land near military installations sparking heightened concerns.
Key Points:
- Foreign Holdings: As of 2022, foreign investors held 43.4 million acres of U.S. agricultural land.
- Concentration: Texas, Maine, and Colorado have the largest foreign-held agricultural land.
- Country of Origin: Canada is the largest foreign landholder, followed by the Netherlands, Italy, and China.
- Chinese Investments: China holds less than 1% of foreign-owned agricultural land in the U.S.
- Land Use: 48% of foreign-owned land is forest, and 28% is cropland, with increasing interest in renewable energy projects.
- Ownership Structure: Foreign holdings include direct ownership, long-term leases, and trusts.
- Trends: Foreign ownership has steadily increased, with notable growth in renewable energy leases on agricultural land.
In addition, Logan’s recent tweet emphasizes her ongoing warnings about the potential dangers posed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). These efforts to infiltrate U.S. territory could be part of a larger strategy to destabilize military and strategic assets without direct conflict. As China continues to expand its influence through various economic and territorial means, it adds further tension to the strained relationship between the U.S. and China. The Biden administration’s response to these developments, including previous incidents like the Chinese spy balloon, is facing significant scrutiny.
Meanwhile, the reported assassination attempt on Donald Trump’s plane raises alarm about threats to his safety, particularly in the context of growing political division and security concerns. While details are still emerging, these threats have sparked discussions about the level of protection needed for high-profile political figures in an increasingly polarized environment. The report came from an informant, adding a layer of intrigue and raising questions about the motivations behind such an act.
China’s strategy of economic infiltration, particularly through land ownership, is part of a broader effort to position itself for potential hostilities with the U.S. Logan’s concerns reflect growing unease among security experts and politicians, with many calling for stricter regulations on foreign land ownership, especially near sensitive military areas. These actions come at a time when China is rapidly modernizing its military and expanding its global influence, potentially threatening U.S. interests worldwide.
Logan’s investigations suggest that China is preparing for more than just economic dominance; she sees their actions as part of a calculated plan to disrupt U.S. defenses. This echoes long-standing concerns about China’s ambition to assert itself as a global superpower, with economic strategies often serving as precursors to military positioning. Critics argue that allowing these land deals to proceed without oversight only exacerbates vulnerabilities within U.S. security.
Lara Logan's recent tweet further reinforces her warnings about China's growing threat to U.S. national security. She emphasizes concerns surrounding Chinese acquisition of farmland near military bases, claiming it could be part of a broader strategy by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to position itself for unconventional warfare. This mirrors her argument that China is infiltrating key U.S. areas for potential conflict.
These countries collaborate on various economic, political, and social issues, focusing on reforming global governance structures and promoting development in the Global South. The group was originally known as BRIC before South Africa joined in 2010. BRICS countries represent a significant portion of global population, GDP, and influence in international relations, and they often advocate for reducing reliance on the U.S. dollar in global trade.
BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa):
- BRICS Expansion: De-dollarization, Global Governance Reform, and New Memberships
- Scenario: USA Goes to War with Iran Following Israel-Iran Conflict
- Hypothetical AI War Between NATO and BRICS: A Decade of Conflict
- NATO Military Buildup Against BRICS Since World War II
The combination of the assassination attempt on Trump and China’s land acquisition paints a troubling picture of internal and external threats to U.S. security. These developments highlight the need for immediate action to safeguard national interests and protect high-profile political figures. Without swift intervention, both foreign and domestic threats could escalate further, undermining national stability.
The 2022 AFIDA (Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act) report outlines foreign land ownership in the U.S., focusing on agricultural and non-agricultural holdings. Foreign ownership of U.S. agricultural land increased to 43.4 million acres in 2022, with the largest investments in Texas, Maine, and Colorado. The majority of foreign-held land is forest and cropland, with Canadian investors holding the largest share, followed by investors from the Netherlands, Italy, and China. Chinese holdings account for less than 1% of foreign-held U.S. agricultural land but are spread across several states.
Foreign investment trends show a growing interest in renewable energy development, with foreign companies using large parcels for wind and solar energy projects. While foreign ownership of U.S. land remains a small percentage of total agricultural land, concerns persist about the implications for national security and food production. Some states have seen decreases in foreign holdings due to terminated leases and land sales. Despite these fluctuations, the report shows that foreign-held land continues to rise, particularly in southern and western states.
Foreign investors reported diverse ownership structures, including direct ownership, long-term leases, and trusts. In 2022, significant increases in foreign-held land were observed in cropland and pastureland, reflecting both renewable energy leases and large land acquisitions by foreign companies. Foreign ownership is concentrated in a few countries, with China holding a relatively small but notable share of U.S. agricultural land. The report also discusses the challenges of tracking foreign investments due to complex ownership structures and multi-country investment groups.
While foreign investments in U.S. agricultural land have economic benefits, such as job creation and higher land values, the report highlights potential risks, including the displacement of domestic farmers and the strategic use of U.S. land by foreign entities. The implications for rural communities and national policy remain under review as foreign-held land continues to increase.
Cited References:
